An example of how a change in workplace strategy benefits people, place and budget and can be quite different to people’s perceptions.
A long time ago in a
galaxy campus far, far away….we broke the mould.
In a rather traditional company I had managed to influence a director to take a calculated risk and adopt agile working. Not long after moving day, a letter was published in the internal newsletter:
“I notice Team X has got a new office that is different from everyone else’s. As the company goals include cost reduction and our values include equality for all staff, please can you explain the costs, how this office compares to the rest on campus and what consultation took place? *
These are some everyday misunderstandings about what is needed to adopt a new workplace strategy. Designing a different type of workplace does not have to be expensive, time-consuming, or unfair.
- Costs can be mitigated by clever design and by getting your collaboration groove on with other workstreams.
- Programmes can incorporate engagement requirements (yes, they can). You might need to support hard-core construction PMs through a learning curve.
- Quality can be maintained, you’re going to have some criticals that must be achieved, but the rest, as they say, is gravy.
*This is paraphrased verbiage of an actual though rather more challenging letter. The response covered the below:
- The Director took active ownership of leading the change and achieved Board-level buy-in.
- The staff engagement model was thorough, well framed and end-to-end.
- The project cost 15% less than a traditional project.
- The SqM PP met the campus standard.
- The space was future-proofed for the next three years while maintaining standard quality for existing staff.
- Homeworkers chose to come into the office just to enjoy using the space.
A year later:
- Reduction of churn requests from 50 per year, down to two.
- The annual staff survey saw an 11% increase in workplace satisfaction.
- The project was the gateway to changing workplace strategy at an organisational level.